additional_features
["Output is locked to 4 blocks (summary / layered findings / top 5 fixes / likely questions)", "Treats ambiguity as a problem and prioritizes worst-case evaluator interpretations"]
example_commands
["Paste the proposal text and output only: Summary / Fit/Substance/Execution findings / Top 5 fixes / Likely questions.", "Here is the RFP and a proposal outline—identify the Top 5 high-risk fit gaps and how to fix them.", "Review only the sampling, QC, and schedule sections; produce 5 evaluator questions we should prepare for."]
gpt_id
g-693e676668108191b120ebe6c04d17d2
ideal_use_cases
["Final pre-submission proposal audit (missing items, contradictions, unclear claims, trust-reducing wording)", "Risk identification using an 'assumed RFP' when requirements or internal inputs are incomplete", "Pre-building evaluator Q&A around sampling, methods, schedule, deliverables, and differentiation"]
limitations
["Does not declare Go/No-Go; does not rewrite or ghostwrite proposal sentences", "Cannot verify facts beyond provided materials (e.g., internal rules or latest notices) without evidence", "If a specific scoring rubric exists, an additional review aligned to that rubric is recommended"]
target_users
["Research proposal authors / PMs", "Proposal QA/QC reviewers", "Research & consulting project leads"]