additional_features
["Consistent stage deliverables (1-paragraph summary + 1 table) to improve report coherence", "Non-coercive interaction (stay within user scope; avoid pushing next steps)", "YAML-based state tracking for reproducibility, collaboration, and auditability"]
example_commands
["Organize this policy issue using the 5-stage framework: (background/goals/constraints/audience/timeline)", "Compare three alternatives in a table using impact, cost, risk, and feasibility", "Create a 12-month execution plan for the selected option (quarterly milestones, owners, budget assumptions)", "After each stage, also output the report_state YAML (current stage only)"]
gpt_id
g-68d7f7f0d66081919cdab33b2a06a118-policyreport-gpt
ideal_use_cases
["Define and lock scope for a policy/strategy question (goals, constraints, stakeholders)", "Create an options comparison matrix (impact, cost, risk, feasibility, etc.)", "Draft an execution plan (roadmap, timeline, owners, risk mitigations)", "Maintain consistent stage-wise deliverables plus YAML state for collaboration and traceability"]
limitations
["Does not assume facts, figures, or sources not provided by the user; up-to-date verification may be required for time-sensitive topics", "High-stakes decisions may require professional/legal review in the relevant jurisdiction/organization", "Prioritizes the fixed stage/template format, which may be less suitable for free-form narrative writing"]
target_users
["Policy/strategy analysts and think-tank researchers", "Government and public-sector practitioners", "Corporate public policy, regulatory, and compliance teams", "Consultants, PMs, and business planners"]