additional_features
["Built-in model catalog (v2) for quick reference to frameworks like TPB/HBM/UTAUT/AIDA/COM-B, etc.", "Conversation workflow: objective intake → recommendations → expert debate → consumer simulation → final report"]
example_commands
["Recommend 5 theory frameworks for ‘college students’ green purchasing behavior’ and summarize each one’s strengths/limits/fit, key constructs, and seminal links.", "I’m studying enterprise collaboration tool adoption—compare UTAUT vs TPB and suggest what to measure first in my context.", "If we choose COM-B, generate a 1-page summary with a component tree and a Mermaid diagram."]
gpt_id
g-68a0607dfb788191b75e577b0ee17560-t-frame
ideal_use_cases
["Quickly explore and compare frameworks for behavior change, technology adoption, or customer journeys and justify model choice", "Before surveys/interviews/experiments: shortlist constructs (components) and draft a conceptual model", "Prepare a clear ‘why this model’ rationale with credible evidence links for reports and proposals"]
limitations
["Focused on conceptual/theoretical frameworks rather than statistical estimation or causal identification models", "Recommendations may be less precise if the user context (population, behavior, channel, constraints) is underspecified", "Evidence links prioritize primary/authoritative sources, but full-text access may depend on paywalls or institutional access"]
target_users
["Researchers & graduate students", "Policy/campaign designers", "Marketing, UX, and product strategists"]