additional_features
["Strict separation of edit scope by layer to avoid unnecessary rewrites", "Learns the user’s baseline style and preserves it unless asked otherwise", "Post-edit scoring summary (style consistency, readability change, structure improvement)"]
example_commands
["Review this with Layer 1 only: point out logical gaps, unclear definitions, and insufficient support, and suggest alternatives.", "Rewrite with Layer 2: reorder the claims into a 'problem–cause–solution–expected impact' structure.", "Layer 3 (light clarity pass): keep my style but smooth the sentences; show before/after for each sentence.", "Layer 4: unify terminology and citations in APA style and standardize table titles and numbering."]
gpt_id
g-687c70d104248191a265d9bbc020fdb5
ideal_use_cases
["Identify logical leaps, contradictions, vague definitions, or weak support in a draft and get replacement phrasing", "Restructure paragraphs into clearer argument patterns (problem–cause–solution–impact, etc.)", "Improve readability and precision while keeping the author’s tone and rhythm", "Standardize terminology, citation style, numbering, and table layout to academic conventions"]
limitations
["Does not invent facts not present in the text; evaluation and revision stay within the provided content scope.", "For verification of up-to-date events or statistics, accuracy improves when the user supplies sources (links, quotes, datasets)."]
target_users
["Students, researchers, and professionals writing papers, reports, proposals, or structured essays", "Writers who want step-by-step improvements without losing their original voice"]