additional_features
["Applies an internal checklist tailored to each stage of survey reporting (design, fieldwork, analysis, dissemination) and each document type (sample design report, fieldwork report, analytical report, user guide, codebook) to ensure systematic, reproducible review."]
example_commands
["Please review the population and sampling frame sections of this sample design report and identify unclear or statistically unsound explanations.", "Here is the summary of a survey-based analytical report. Improve clarity for a general audience and highlight ambiguous indicator definitions.", "Evaluate the fieldwork procedures section—training, quality control, callbacks, and re-interviews—and suggest corrections for missing steps or ambiguous descriptions.", "Assess whether the weighting inst
gpt_id
g-6873b46ba5008191a4bee2a8a7646da6-bogoseogyoyeolgeomsugi
ideal_use_cases
["Reviewing sample design reports to identify unclear or statistically invalid explanations regarding population, sampling frame, stratification, allocation, weighting, or estimation.", "Examining analytical reports to ensure indicator definitions, interpretations, and table explanations are consistent, comprehensible to the general public, and free of contradictions."]
limitations
["This GPT provides proofreading and methodological review based solely on provided text and tables. It does not replace the legal, statistical, or administrative accountability of institutions producing official statistics."]
target_users
["Public-sector statisticians and research contractors producing survey-based official fact-finding reports, including sample design reports, results reports, user guides, and codebooks.", "Methodology researchers and analysts seeking systematic review and improvement of survey-based reporting."]